Truthbomb: Doctor McCullough Joe Rogan podcast was just released

a reply to: Bearack


That drug only has 1 pathway to inhibit viral replication much like remdisivir, and both are way less effective than ivermectin on paper and based on existing trials.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
a reply to: Bearack


That drug only has 1 pathway to inhibit viral replication much like remdisivir, and both are way less effective than ivermectin on paper and based on existing trials.

Because you say so?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Or this guy!

a reply to: Bearack

Ack.... www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Bearack

Is he a Doctor?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

A nurse with a doctorate.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Also, they were both shown to not be effective when given late.

Those meds actually digest the spikes on the COVID membrane disabling its ability to attach to cells and replicate. This was proven after SARS COV1, and even Fauchi wrote about it. They cite that in the interview, but I knew about this before and have posted it in the past.

Educate yourself. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Is there a place to get this besides Spotify>?

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

What?

Both HCQ and Ivermection have been proven to be extremely effective at treating the symptoms of covid 19, AND reducing hospitalizations for covid.

That's called a treatment.

Meanwhile, they changed the purpose of the vaccine from "stopping you from getting covid," which is what a vaccine is supposed to do, to "reducing hospitalizations from covid," which is a treatment, and what HCQ and Ivermectin actually do, and cheaply at that.

originally posted by: RMFX1
I just got done watching this. Fantastic interview.

Just as an aside though, I think it's remarkable, even admirable in a way that a certain poster seems to have an incredible talent for turning every thread that they post in to sh!t. I'd recommend that others do as I do and skip said posts. I just wish that they'd stop changing their avatar purely because it makes identifying said poster a little harder and by the time I read the name, I may have already been poisoned by their BS contributions.

Shame we don't have an inbuilt ignore feature.

The day people can ignore alternative viewpoints to their own and the day each thread becomes and echochamber where posters slap each other on the are will be the day this website dies. Stop suppressing opinions.

a reply to: chr0naut


"Like have you heard the snake-oil guys say about how Ivermectin is 'cheap'? It has never been cheap. It is one of the more expensive medicines, even for veterinary use, and 'a course of it' is way more expensive than three doses of the Pfizer vax. Check out the prices for yourself

What are you talking about? It costs $168 USD for 1,000 12 mg ivermectin pills.

do you need me to do the math for you???!!!!

We are talking $3.38 US for an average 89.8 KG America to be given 5 days of Ivermectin at 0.5 mg/kg

the Pfizer vaccine costs what, about 23.15? X3 = 69.45

so not 10x , but but mote than 20x more expensive.

You said that a course of Ivermectin costs more than 3 rounds of the Pfizer vaccine.

not even comparable.

Just to be clear, All I'm saying is this bull# about Ivermectin being expensive is propaganda that you bought, chewed up and spat out here for the rest of people who might be stupid enough to go check the goodrx.com price of Ivermectin.

Ivermectin is available to be ordered for $168 per 1,000 12 mg pills.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

So you trust a Joe Rogan pod cast over medical health trained professionals. LoL

Presented with the evidence, from 3 different sources.

Computer says you cannot or refuse to read.

What you want to believe son is nonsensical right wing lunatics.

no he trusts the esteemed medical professional who was on the Joe Rogan podcast.

this might be a news flash, but he was treating covid 19 long before he appeared on the podcast...Because he's a doctor.

and his published covid 19 treatment works.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

Then your "published doctor" is prescribing Ivermectin for people when its only FDA approved at very specific doses and for some parasitic worms as well as head lice.

Ivermectin isn't an antiviral.

And has only shown promise where COVID 19 is concerned under specific laboratory conditions.

Even then the problem is not even with doctors prescribing Ivermectin to patients.

But from people the who cannot get prescriptions who then go on to find it in the likes of feed stores or purchase it online from spurious sources.

This isn't true, the FDA has guidelines for using drugs off label and the dosing is 100% safe.

again, the FDA has guidelines for prescribing drugs off label and he's following the guidelines.

Do you lie on purpose or do you just make a habit of saying things you don't understand enough about

again, the FDA has guidelines for prescribing drugs off label and he's following those guidelines.

people desperately dosing themselves with Ivermectin in an unsafe way is irrelevant.

Also Ivermectin isn't just given on its own. Dr McCullough has a published covid 19 treatment protocol that he published in 2020 and there's a variety of interventions required. He's very clear that Ivermectin alone isn't the treatment, it's a mutli drug approach

originally posted by: Acknt
a reply to: chr0naut


"Like have you heard the snake-oil guys say about how Ivermectin is 'cheap'? It has never been cheap. It is one of the more expensive medicines, even for veterinary use, and 'a course of it' is way more expensive than three doses of the Pfizer vax. Check out the prices for yourself"

What are you talking about? It costs $168 USD for 1,000 12 mg ivermectin pills.

do you need me to do the math for you???!!!!

We are talking $3.38 US for an average 89.8 KG America to be given 5 days of Ivermectin at 0.5 mg/kg

the Pfizer vaccine costs what, about 23.15? X3 = 69.45

so not 10x , but but mote than 20x more expensive.

You said that a course of Ivermectin costs more than 3 rounds of the Pfizer vaccine.

not even comparable.

Just to be clear, All I'm saying is this bull# about Ivermectin being expensive is propaganda that you bought, chewed up and spat out here for the rest of people who might be stupid enough to go check the goodrx.com price of Ivermectin.

Ivermectin is available to be ordered for $168 per 1,000 12 mg pills.

originally posted by: rounda

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

What?

Both HCQ and Ivermection have been proven to be extremely effective at treating the symptoms of covid 19, AND reducing hospitalizations for covid.

That's called a treatment.

And yet, drugs regulatory authorities in countries around the world won't approve HQC or ivermectin for use as a treatment for COVID-19?

The Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the European Medicines Agency, the American Medical Association, the American Pharmacists Association, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the World Health Organization have stated that ivermectin is not authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.

Why is that, if it is so good?

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Meanwhile, they changed the purpose of the vaccine from "stopping you from getting covid," which is what a vaccine is supposed to do, to "reducing hospitalizations from covid," which is a treatment, and what HCQ and Ivermectin actually do, and cheaply at that.

No vaccine is 100% effective. Most vaccines require multiple vaccinations to be effective, and most of them reduce in effect over time.

No-one "changed the purpose of a vaccine", just for the COVID-19 vaccines.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: rounda

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

What?

Both HCQ and Ivermection have been proven to be extremely effective at treating the symptoms of covid 19, AND reducing hospitalizations for covid.

That's called a treatment.

And yet, drugs regulatory authorities in countries around the world won't approve HQC or ivermectin for use as a treatment for COVID-19?

The Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the European Medicines Agency, the American Medical Association, the American Pharmacists Association, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the World Health Organization have stated that ivermectin is not authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.

Why is that, if it is so good?

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Meanwhile, they changed the purpose of the vaccine from "stopping you from getting covid," which is what a vaccine is supposed to do, to "reducing hospitalizations from covid," which is a treatment, and what HCQ and Ivermectin actually do, and cheaply at that.

No vaccine is 100% effective. Most vaccines require multiple vaccinations to be effective, and most of them reduce in effect over time.

No-one "changed the purpose of a vaccine", just for the COVID-19 vaccines.

Did you listen to the podcast. It directly addresses your points.

a reply to: andy06shake

My niece who is a nurse and my friend. Their names are none of your business. They both live in Florida.

You are gullible enough to trust the FDA. I'm not.

You probably don't realize it, but the FDA serves at the pleasure of the pharmaceutical industry.

a reply to: JinMI

No, because it would be banned. Spotify is free, however.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: rounda

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

What?

Both HCQ and Ivermection have been proven to be extremely effective at treating the symptoms of covid 19, AND reducing hospitalizations for covid.

That's called a treatment.

And yet, drugs regulatory authorities in countries around the world won't approve HQC or ivermectin for use as a treatment for COVID-19?

The Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the European Medicines Agency, the American Medical Association, the American Pharmacists Association, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the World Health Organization have stated that ivermectin is not authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.

Why is that, if it is so good?

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Meanwhile, they changed the purpose of the vaccine from "stopping you from getting covid," which is what a vaccine is supposed to do, to "reducing hospitalizations from covid," which is a treatment, and what HCQ and Ivermectin actually do, and cheaply at that.

No vaccine is 100% effective. Most vaccines require multiple vaccinations to be effective, and most of them reduce in effect over time.

No-one "changed the purpose of a vaccine", just for the COVID-19 vaccines.

I was gonna ignore you, but you're straight up LYING. They changed the definition of the word vaccine to "provide protection" instead of immunization so it would be inclusive of the corona vaccine.

a reply to: andy06shake

And why are people self medicating? Because they have no other choice. Of course they overdose from time to time. They are no doctors and doctors are even afraid of losing their job if they would try to help with ivermectin. Do you find this normal??
Btw there are studies pro and contra ivermectin. just like with Remdesivir and almost every medecin.
Just an example www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...