It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
GBS is a disorder in which a body’s immune system attacks the nerves, and can eventually paralyze the whole body. Most people with the condition require hospitalization. A “statistically significant increase” in GBS cases was observed after the first AstraZeneca shot. The researchers had expected 76 GBS events in the observational cohort study but ended up identifying 190.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is a condition that typically occurs after a bacterial or viral infection. It causes inflammation of the central nervous system. Two cases were expected. However, the study identified seven events after the first Moderna jab.
Bell’s palsy is a weakness or paralysis of facial muscles. Higher than expected Bell’s palsy cases were identified after the first dose of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
CVST is a condition in which blood clots form in the brain, blocking the blood from draining out. This can end up causing a hemorrhage. While 21 events were expected, researchers identified over three times the number of cases at 69 following the first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine. CVST cases were also higher than expected after the first and second Pfizer shots.
Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle. Higher than expected cases of myocarditis that met the threshold for “prioritized safety signals” for the condition were “consistently identified following a first, second, and third dose of mRNA vaccines,” both Pfizer and Moderna, according to the study.
Pericarditis is an inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. The number of pericarditis cases exceeded expectations following “all doses of all the three vaccines,” researchers wrote.
The peer-reviewed observational cohort study, published in the Vaccine journal on Feb. 12, aimed to evaluate the risk of 13 adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination. The AESIs spanned three categories—neurological, hematologic (blood), and cardiovascular.
It reviewed data collected from more than 99 million vaccinated people from eight nations—Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, New Zealand, and Scotland—looking at risks up to 42 days after getting the shots.
originally posted by: tarantulabite1
a reply to: chr0naut
Maybe you are right .... I do remember seeing some saying it was only used in Testing........Can't say if true or not.
I do remember this info ...again do not know if was only for Testing or not.
Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds - www.lifesitenews.com...
This is probably all it was and it was about greed as well and you are correct. They permanently destroyed forever generations of trust in vaccines that is how crazy and foolish and ignorant they where. I saw a guy on Tucker Carlson and He said it is estimated that nearly 17 million people died from the COVID vaccine.
originally posted by: ARM19688
They did their job. Excess deaths were a happy accident. The main point was to damage fertility and offer a long term solution to a growing population. Don’t hit all their targets, but enough. Funny that the fools behind it all don’t realise what they have brought upon themselves.
originally posted by: ksihkahe
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
It seems as time has gone by, by more and more standards of health care the lockdowns and vaccinations were irrelevant to health outcomes.It seems to have become detrimental to the general health of the general population. With all things considered the ensuing censorship of even discussing the matter, to such an extent that France is considering prison sentences for saying anything detrimental about the vaccines. To sum it up the subject of discussing vaccines is taboo in most places where it involves the general population. At the moment as evidence is being gathered and analyzed evidence is coming out that points to the vaccinations being something else entirely and having nothing to do with health.
So what was it all about? This is from Maria Zee who interviewed a couple, who have left the USA and are coordinating the rapidly assembling data that points to the truth of the situation and gives the reasons and information to back it up.rumble.com...
In the real world that exists outside of the 'forbidden video' sites (that seem curiously accessible), the immunizations have provably saved millions of lives and few recipients have had serious adverse reactions.
Feel free to show those proven facts in the thread that addresses your lie about Ivermectin and COVID vaccine safety from a couple weeks back.
You're only lying to yourselves when you ignore the battles you know you can't win, allowing yourself to believe that you somehow avoided a hit to your credibility. Sorry, but everybody notices and knows exactly who isn't showing up to correct my "dangerous disinformation".
Ivermectin safety and efficacy versus COVID vaccines
As I mentioned to another poster it would be a good time to reflect on how making things up has a detrimental effect on your mission. Had you not repeated this behavior time and time again, then people wouldn't immediately reject everything you say.
Nobody even cares about the "mark of the beast" conspiracies you've come to debunk. You can't even deny a Christian prophecy video without sliding in a preposterous claim that a "few" recipients have had serious adverse reactions. Many billions of doses of anything will have more than a "few" serious adverse reactions and it should be insulting to people that you think they'll believe it. You are claiming that the rate of serious adverse events for COVID vaccines, including the ones pulled off the market for serious adverse reactions, is way lower than 1 in 50,000,000?
I don't understand how adults can believe that repeatedly refusing to admit to errors and then running away when caught in lies doesn't rapidly erase their credibility. You are a casestudy in how mobilizing an army of volunteer science fact-checkers, using ethically-challenged laypeople with authoritarian leanings, has resulted in the biggest loss of trust in public health in history.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
Are we not a bit beyond that, with a proven wifi signal in the 2300 GH range
emitting from vaccinated individuals? which has been analyzed
as the registered numbers for Biological probes
and GPS communicating
with the Bluetooth mesh network
, it cant be spun it is illegal and has, the funders of the fact checkers name all over it.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
People do lie and spin, and YouTube has the most amazing BS, for a censored site, but probing down through the mire to get to the nitty-gritty. Anyone with any common sense can separate a nutter from someone trying to do a reasonable assessment. This leaves one with the continuing impression that the fact remains that people are emitting a blue tooth signal. It is verifiable to anyone who has an Android phone. This should get a severe debunking. but the problem with a true testable fact is that it can't be debunked, these days what can't be debunked gets ignored as an irrelevance.
The difference is that a wearable device is optional, and can be removed if any problems arrive, but a covertly installed internal device has a host of problems in an already polluted EMF environment. As for your dropping-like-flies statement morbidity precedes mortality, and any party that can install a covert biologically activated system in the human body under the guise of vaccinations can easily drip-feed acceptable death rates that do not spook the population.
If this is not a reasonable assessment, of what seems to be occurring then feel free to offer an alternative explanation. Granted it could all be a subtle Psy OP, but the amount of independent people from many countries observing the same effect, means having a labor force devoted to it which would now be in the hundreds if not thousands.
As a bit more to the dropping like flies, here is a Doctor who got jabbed up twice and realized that it is unsafe and ineffective, and has to work now to pay off legal bills since he has a target on his back. He offered to give all the MPs in the British Parliament their spring boosters from the public supply, but of course has no takers. What he is saying does not line up with the stats, but it is for the individual to work out if he is mistaken, lying...or a competent Dr doing his best for his patients. www.bitchute.com...