The Impeachment Inquiry of U.S. President Joseph R. Biden - Charges and Developments.

originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: carewemust

Biden really meant it when he says no one f u c k with the bidens.

That, and declaring Hunter The smartest man he knows, are two things he honestly believes.

a reply to: 727Sky

Russia sent an online tourist brochure to Donald Trump Jr at Trump Tower. The media went nuts declaring how a connection between Russia and the Trump family had been made.

THE HEARING DAY #1 has started.

Live on CNN and FOXNEWS and MSNBC. But not on CBS/ABC/CBS, like the Trump Impeachment hearings.

3 years in and were just making it to the inquiry stage? Trump was already impeached twice by this time in his term. What are the Republicans doing?

People aren't actually buying the Republicans are working for them still are they? Because if so Biden would be long gone by now. The available evidence would make it almost impossible not to impeached Biden.

So I ask again what have the Republicans been the last 3 years? Rather than supporting war of course.

Jamie Raskin is healed of Cancer apparently (thanks to Joe Biden?). His pirate hat is gone, and people are standing behind him holding up posters/signs of some kind. Weird.

a reply to: carewemust

He's been in remission since April.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: carewemust

He's been in remission since April.

That's good. Raskin has taken over from Nadler in demonstrating how Democrats operate.

a reply to: JAY1980

Republicans didn't have the ability to launch impeachment proceedings until 9 months ago. Not 3 years ago, as you're stating.

Funny how CNN only lets you HEAR what's being said when Raskin is talking. CNN host says they'll only cut to the hearing through the day when "interesting" people are presenting. We know what that means, lol.

I just want to point out from earlier comments made by Comer that the $260,000 that Hunter received from Jonathan Li (from Bejing), the one that Hunter's attorneys are trying to call a "loan", was labeled as a "personal investment" on the wire transfer documents.

The GOP's own witness, Jonathan Turley, has testified:

I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment.

a reply to: Threadbare

That's all a matter of opinion. The Democrats made up and faked the evidence they had against Trump regarding Russiagate. No one in their right mind believes that Biden is going to accept bribes in his own name. The evidence DOES support that Biden has benefitted from money that's been funneled through Hunter. Including many text messages from Hunter's laptop talking about 10% to the Big Guy, telling his children that he had to give half of his salary to "pop" over a period of 30 years, and emails from accountants showing that Hunter was paying many of Joe's personal bills and renovation work being done on Biden's Delaware home.

Are we sure these are the GOP witnesses? So far, they do not seem to be helping the case.

a reply to: frogs453

The Democrats are trying to turn this into a joke and making it all about Trump. Trump's name shouldn't even be allowed in these hearings.

a reply to: Threadbare

The GOP's own witness, Jonathan Turley, has testified:

he also testified against both trump impeachments. Turly is a toe the line kinda guy, believes in very thorough investigations, not pick and choose, piling on charges and hope they stick, and not snap of the fingers impeach by Christmas.

originally posted by: Threadbare
The GOP's own witness, Jonathan Turley, has testified:

I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment.

Basically 2 of the 4 panel members have noted that there is no basis for an impeachment.

The third (Dabinsky) is the yes man.

The fourth (O’Conner) just admitted that when she wrote and stated, “Biden should go to jail!” She left out the name Hunter “to save time.”

I think these dumbo republicans just may pull off the impeachment of Hunter Biden.

Does anyone else find it odd that more than a few members of this hearing have referred to Joe Biden as Joe Bider?

I predict this is going to be a really short thread.

Taking bets.

4 to 6 pages max

a reply to: 3000Hard

Yet the majority of these witnesses are all currently saying that the emails from Hunter are concerning and definitely should be investigated further, including the org chart showing all of the shell companies.

a reply to: Deetermined

They have been investigating for months. This was supposed to be the proof of wrong doing to support their impeachment. The proof is "investigate" more?