COVID-19: The Great Reset - By Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret

COVID-19: The Great Reset PDF link

dochub.com...

Web page with more stuff about The Great Reset

Well it's finally out for everyone to read.

I had a squiz and well truth be told, it surprised me. There's ethics and morale's, hopes and dreams for not getting into a Dystopian future.

Oh blood hell I just realised it came out on 03 Jun 2020.

originally posted by: DaRAGE
COVID-19: The Great Reset PDF link

Web page with more stuff about The Great Reset

Well it's finally out for everyone to read.

I had a squiz and well truth be told, it surprised me. There's ethics and morale's, hopes and dreams for not getting into a Dystopian future.

Oh blood hell I just realised it came out on 03 Jun 2020.

We can't download it?

a reply to: musicismagic

added another link.

dochub.com...

originally posted by: DaRAGE
a reply to: musicismagic

added another link.

dochub.com...

Thanks 110 pages long. good read

originally posted by: DaRAGE
COVID-19: The Great Reset PDF link

dochub.com...

Web page with more stuff about The Great Reset

Well it's finally out for everyone to read.

I had a squiz and well truth be told, it surprised me. There's ethics and morale's, hopes and dreams for not getting into a Dystopian future.

Oh blood hell I just realised it came out on 03 Jun 2020.

Somebody needs to say this, so it might as well be me but...

This is so American centric that I don't even know where to begin.

When you look at this from outside the US none of it makes any sense because social and economic situations are so very different, and the way that people think about things like government is so very different. To people in my country, we look at things like this and just cannot understand how they reach these conclusions, or why they see certain things as being a threat rather than something to be fought tooth and nail for.

For example why do people think that depopulation would start with middle class white suburbs, and not the poor black ghettos?

Here the poor would be the first to be culled, and the middle classes would be leading the charge.

a reply to: DaRAGE

Very informative read...thanks for the link.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

For example why do people think that depopulation would start with middle class white suburbs, and not the poor black ghettos?

Here the poor would be the first to be culled, and the middle classes would be leading the charge.

I'm at page 30 and so far this isn't about depopulation but rather a new world after Covid and how we choose to shape it.

a reply to: DaRAGE

I had a squiz and well truth be told, it surprised me. There's ethics and morale's, hopes and dreams for not getting into a Dystopian future.

I too have had a squiz and all I can say is never concentrate on the hand presented to you. It's the one hidden behind the lying #ers back that you need to look out for.

2030. You will own nothing and you will be happy. Cause if you're not , it's room 101.

Watch this video.

It's on Off-Guardian and originally from UKColumn. Click on the 5minute mark and watch the next 1 minute and a half or so.

It's dystopian. They can colour it up anyway they want to pull the wool, and I'm sure they will. Fact is, their future for you is a prison.

a reply to: myselfaswell

I don't get it..We are constantly slapped over the head on ATS with terms such as Globalization and how a global elite cabal is behind it all. The New World Order is planning this globalization to make way for a one-world governement...etc etc.

Globalization, in the view of Theodore Levitt, was talking about markets.

“Two vectors shape the world – technology and globalization. … Regardless of how much preferences evolve and diverge, they also gradually converge and form markets where economies of scale lead to reduction of costs and prices.”

But really anything can be "global"..global culture, global society, global community, global ideas, global beliefs etc.

Back to Levitt, he recognized that :"A powerful force drives the world toward a converging commonality, and that force is technology. … Almost everyone everywhere wants all the things they have heard about, seen, or experienced via the new technologies.”

Now you could blame giant multinational, big corporation or the media for brainwashing you into thinking you need the things you need but at the end of the day it's the things we want that drive this globalization.

Want Pizza but don't live in Italy? Want country music but don't live in Texas?..all examples of globalization without even touching on recent developments like the Internet and Smartphones.

Interdependence is a logical by-product of globalization. To quote DaRAGE link:

interdependence is the dynamic of reciprocal dependence among the elements that compose a system.

Now some people have noticed that:

An interdependent world is a world of deep systemic connectivity, in which all risks affect each other through a web of complex interactions. In such conditions, the assertion that an economic risk will be confined to the economic sphere or that an environmental risk won’t have repercussions on risks of a different nature (economic, geopolitical and so on) is no longer tenable. We can all think of economic risks turning into political ones (like a sharp rise in unemployment leading to pockets of social unrest), or of technological risks mutating into societal ones (such as the issue of tracing the pandemic on mobile phones provoking a societal backlash). When considered in isolation, individual risks – whether economic, geopolitical, societal or environmental in character – give the false impression that they can be contained or mitigated; in real life, systemic connectivity shows this to be an artificial construct. In an interdependent world, risks amplify each other and, in so doing, have cascading effects. That is why isolation or containment cannot rhyme with interdependence and interconnectedness.

So sort of like a butterfly effect where everything influences the other. like this graph...



You'd have to be a freaking wizard if you are able to predict and manipulate this to a point where you can enslave the global population or whatever it is we are fearing.

Let's just appreciate that it is a very dynamic system of our own creation and the only way to stop it is by unplugging everything and go back to living in caves.

a reply to: keukendeur

Did you watch the video link? It was a simple suggestion. It will consume about 1minute 30seconds of your time.

You can draw as many diagrams around it as you like. I grew up with a very deep understanding of humanity, the really really bad stuff, the stuff that actually happens in reality, not the flow charts and diagrams, and I can smell sh!t from a mile away.

a reply to: myselfaswell
Okay..I watched it.

BIS wants away from cash and push electronic currency. The mistake I seem to find is where they conclude that this is a way of "controlling" your money instead of knowing where all the money is.

Did you read the 100 page publishing in the OP which this thread is about?

a reply to: keukendeur

As I said, I skimmed it. I also said that you should never concentrate on the hand presented to you ...... and that I can smell sh!t from a mile away.

originally posted by: keukendeur

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

For example why do people think that depopulation would start with middle class white suburbs, and not the poor black ghettos?

Here the poor would be the first to be culled, and the middle classes would be leading the charge.

I'm at page 30 and so far this isn't about depopulation but rather a new world after Covid and how we choose to shape it.

Yes, I know. I'm was commenting on how different things look from outside of the US, opinions on depopulation was a second example seperate from the content of the document.

What I'm saying is that this document makes no sense when you take the global situation into account, and that us views on depopulation are another area that similarly makes no sense outside of the US.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
...... and that I can smell sh!t from a mile away.

Well that's good enough for me. Lead the way ye of great smell!!

Viva la revolution!!!

originally posted by: keukendeur
a reply to: myselfaswell
Okay..I watched it.

BIS wants away from cash and push electronic currency. The mistake I seem to find is where they conclude that this is a way of "controlling" your money instead of knowing where all the money is.

Did you read the 100 page publishing in the OP which this thread is about?

Here we simply want to carry less cash. We're demanding that business go cashless, and they're moving too slowly for us. It's so annoying that I could buy food from a vending machine with my phone in Japan 20 years ago, but in my home country 99 percent of vending machines don't even accept contact less cards, let alone nfc payments from phones.

My watch has an nfc chip in it, I should be able to pay using that, but most if the feature simply aren't supported in this country.

Over here a cashless society is a dream, not a conspiracy.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: DaRAGE
COVID-19: The Great Reset PDF link

dochub.com...

Web page with more stuff about The Great Reset

Well it's finally out for everyone to read.

I had a squiz and well truth be told, it surprised me. There's ethics and morale's, hopes and dreams for not getting into a Dystopian future.

Oh blood hell I just realised it came out on 03 Jun 2020.

Somebody needs to say this, so it might as well be me but...

This is so American centric that I don't even know where to begin.

When you look at this from outside the US none of it makes any sense because social and economic situations are so very different, and the way that people think about things like government is so very different. To people in my country, we look at things like this and just cannot understand how they reach these conclusions, or why they see certain things as being a threat rather than something to be fought tooth and nail for.

For example why do people think that depopulation would start with middle class white suburbs, and not the poor black ghettos?

Here the poor would be the first to be culled, and the middle classes would be leading the charge.

I'm outside the US,

Try looking at it, not as someone from the country that you are in, but from a 'European Nation' view.
It makes much more sense that way.
Individual countries in Europe are an illusion! Individual politics mean nothing on the grand scale, only a few have real power.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I found this part very interesting when understanding US to non-US matters. (which is often the cause for confusion here on ATS).

The prioritization of business over life has a long tradition,running from the merchants of Siena during the Great Plague to those of Hamburg who tried to conceal the cholera outbreak of 1892. However, it seems almost incongruous that it would remain alive today, with all the medical knowledge and scientific data we have at our disposal. The argument put forward by some groups like “Americans for Prosperity” is that recessions kill people. This, while undoubtedly true, is a fact that is itself rooted in policy choices informed by ethical considerations. In the US, recessions do indeed kill a lot of people because the absence or limited nature of any social safety net makes them life-threatening. How? When people lose their jobs with no state support and no health insurance, they tend to“die of despair” through suicides, drug overdoses and alcoholism, as shown and extensively analyzed by Anne Case and Angus Deaton.[145] Economic recessions also provoke deaths outside of the US, but policy choices in terms of health insurance and worker protection can ensure that there are considerably fewer.This is ultimately a moral choice about whether to prioritize the qualities of individualism or those that favour the destiny of the community. It is an individual as well as a collective choice (that can be expressed through elections), but the example of the pandemic shows that highly individualistic societies are not very good at expressing solidarity.

Now this was 2020 and all we had was quarantines, lock-downs, masks and hording so the whole vaccine issue is not the discussion here.

originally posted by: keukendeur
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I found this part very interesting when understanding US to non-US matters. (which is often the cause for confusion here on ATS).

The prioritization of business over life has a long tradition,running from the merchants of Siena during the Great Plague to those of Hamburg who tried to conceal the cholera outbreak of 1892. However, it seems almost incongruous that it would remain alive today, with all the medical knowledge and scientific data we have at our disposal. The argument put forward by some groups like “Americans for Prosperity” is that recessions kill people. This, while undoubtedly true, is a fact that is itself rooted in policy choices informed by ethical considerations. In the US, recessions do indeed kill a lot of people because the absence or limited nature of any social safety net makes them life-threatening. How? When people lose their jobs with no state support and no health insurance, they tend to“die of despair” through suicides, drug overdoses and alcoholism, as shown and extensively analyzed by Anne Case and Angus Deaton.[145] Economic recessions also provoke deaths outside of the US, but policy choices in terms of health insurance and worker protection can ensure that there are considerably fewer.This is ultimately a moral choice about whether to prioritize the qualities of individualism or those that favour the destiny of the community. It is an individual as well as a collective choice (that can be expressed through elections), but the example of the pandemic shows that highly individualistic societies are not very good at expressing solidarity.

Now this was 2020 and all we had was quarantines, lock-downs, masks and hording so the whole vaccine issue is not the discussion here.

From what I've seen people in the US seem to resent being told to wear a mask or to have a shot, and then look for reasons that make it about the masks or the shot themselves, rather than admitting that they are mostly motivated by a need to defy authority.

Then there's the politics.

Had trump won a second term I have no doubt that the Conservatives would be demanding everybody got vaxxed, and the Liberals saying that the vax was produced too quickly and that its all a plot to disadvantage minorities.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
From what I've seen people in the US seem to resent being told to wear a mask or to have a shot, and then look for reasons that make it about the masks or the shot themselves, rather than admitting that they are mostly motivated by a need to defy authority.

That's the by-product of capitalism and your constitution and I love you guys for it. FREEDOM!!!!

Where democratic socialism isn't a bad thing in Europe, in America it is the gateway to communism.

America isn't for the faint and it comes with the attitude you described.

Then there's the politics.

Had trump won a second term I have no doubt that the Conservatives would be demanding everybody got vaxxed, and the Liberals saying that the vax was produced too quickly and that its all a plot to disadvantage minorities.

I think you are spot on with that assessment.

a reply to: keukendeur

Mate, the truth of the matter is that Schwab et.al are not interested in democracy. His whole idea of stakeholder capitalism is a bastardised old school feudal system whereby the Corporations become Lord & Master, Government are the enforcers & you live your entire life like a prisoner, utterly devoid of any democratic opportunity, but bucket loads of fear.